Generally, a candidate for engineering licensure will graduate from a four-year ABET accredited engineering program, take the Fundamentals of Engineering FE Examination during his or her senior year, start work in an engineering position immediately after graduation, and begin to accumulate qualifying engineering experience in order to take the Principles and Practice of Engineering PE Examination at the earliest opportunity. The usual requirement is four years of qualifying engineering experience.
We were packed in the largest of three rooms in a 2, square foot space baking in the heat generated by ten co-workers in close quarters, fifteen running computers, and an abnormally warm summer.
On the glass doorway was etched the ghostly lettering of the former company occupying the space, serving as a grim reminder of the ever-present possibility of failure.
Silicon Valley is incestuous: They were selling another David versus Goliath story, featuring a small rag-tag team of engineers defeating a seemingly insurmountable industry leader.
Despite my skepticism, I still had a free-running imagination fed with nostalgic thoughts of Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard working on their first audio oscillator in a Palo Alto garage. I was lucky enough to join that company late in the game and sell my stock options early, but many others spent a significant portion of their career at a company that came close to glory but ultimately fell short: Goliath 1, David 0.
This time they were telling me it was going to be different; they were always saying this time would be different.
With the financial incentive of stock options and the confidence gained by working with a crack technical team, everyone was working at full capacity.
There were scribbled drawings with names and dates taped up on a wall. These were the jotted ideas from our team of electrical engineers and physicists with M. One posting was my recent workings of a carbon nano-tube electro-mechanical configuration bit, an idea that a co-worker and I had developed that I would write up and the company would push through the patent process.
By packing a dozen well-caffeinated physics and electronics geniuses into a pathetic three-room rental that resembled a low-budget movie studio, we had created the primordial soup of intellectual invention. It was immensely exciting to be the tenth employee in a growing start-up company that would have to upgrade offices and dramatically expand staff in an up-scaling war against the industry titan.
The increased design responsibility and unbounded architectural creativity that comes with working for a start-up is unparalleled. This danger was extremely real, as a similar start-up had collapsed following an infringement lawsuit related to unauthorized reproduction of a bit stream.
It was immensely satisfying to study, absorb, and then circumvent patent claims as I designed a conceptually similar but un-patented version of three memory blocks.
I am interested in serving as general counsel for a corporation focused on advanced semiconductor technology. I am drawn to the challenges I will find at the intersection of intellectual property, product liability, and corporate law.
At this juncture in my life, I seek more challenge and personal growth in a field that calls on my written skills, attention to detail, and love of technology. My background in nano-technology will bring a unique perspective to the NYU classroom and will make me extremely marketable upon graduation.
By pursuing a law degree, I intend to enter a profession that aligns with the interests and aptitudes I have discovered and developed through real work experience. It is through deep personal reflection that I have decided that law is the natural extension of my training, personality, and talents.
Silicon Valley Start-Up Structure: I led a multi-million dollar design team; I can succeed in law school. This is an excellent personal statement because it shows this candidate has had a tangible impact on organizations, and probably on the global economy.
The statement keeps the reader engaged by giving a meaningful story with background, context, conflict, and resolution. It also provides a peek into the mysterious and increasingly legendary world of Silicon Valley start-ups.
This person is a doer, not a dreamer. The writer shows a depth of technical knowledge and strong analytic reasoning skills that go far beyond linear thinking, especially in the description of finding new solutions to highly technical problems that do not violate patents.
The statement creates desire in the admissions committee to admit this person because other companies seek to hire the applicant and venture capitalists are willing to support the applicant with substantial funds. This applicant demonstrated his strong written communication skills by writing a compelling statement that uses several kinds of rhetorical appeals.
Logic is used to show how his analytical ability helps to keep the company afloat in the same waters where others have foundered. The analogy in which he compares his small start-up and the industry leader to David and Goliath uses both pathos and mythos to excellent effect: The story is one everyone knows, and so just by invoking the names, the writer brings a powerful story into his narrative without using valuable space.
This mythic story becomes a theme woven throughout the essay. This writer has also composed the statement so that he comes across as an authoritative, competent, thoughtful, and honest leader. This essay is too focused on the details of the story and fails to give sufficient evidence for why this person is a good candidate for law school.
The first paragraph is well written but is wholly descriptive prose that has very little to do with why this person is a good candidate for law school. The first paragraph lacks a thesis or a direction for the essay. Ideally, the reader should find a microcosm of the essay in the first paragraph.
The second-to-last paragraph packs in the most value to the admissions committee for the space used, but the background story is important for this paragraph to be so powerful. To make the background story do more work for him, the writer could plant more indicators of his positive qualities and characteristics in the early part of the essay.OK, so putting a personal statement together is never easy But even if you’ve written one before, how you write a personal statement will always depend on your current situation.
In other words, what you write as a school leaver will look a lot different to someone who has many years of previous work experience. Personal Statement: 5 Tips on Writing About Work Experience Work experience is an essential component of your personal statement. Whether you worked every Saturday at your local nursing home or spent two weeks in an operating theatre, you’d be surprised how much you’ve actually learnt – and how relevant it is to medical school, and how.
A personal statement needs to show a company what a candidate can offer, whether it’s skills or relevant experience. It needs to be tailored to the job role, rather than a generic throwaway statement that could apply to anybody.
Jul 08, · I think the key points about veterinary work experience and the personal statement are: 1. Show the vet schools that you have actually learnt something and not just ticked a box to show that you've done the placement.
Show that you appreciate the importance of mastitis prevention in a dairy farm, for example. Objective statement, any kind of recommendation personal. Before you be asked aerospace engineering personal statement help summer heights high essay to.
Uk university think an engineer aerospace doctor of education.
Fabrication of from the aerospace msc bursary. Personal Statement I have always loved space; from the first time I saw the Rover projects on Mars. My ambition from a young age has been to be the part of the team that sends a human to Mars.