Please be notified that all new projects registered from 1st January onwards will be required to use the WE Calculator to compute all relevant WE criteria credit claims. Historic Building Tool Posted on 29 August We are pleased to introduce our latest bespoke rating tool: Please click here to download the Tool.
And 4 using empathy in the closure stage to address any unresolved feelings from the process. Overlaps with deliberative methods[ edit ] Consensus decision-making models overlap significantly with deliberative methodswhich are processes for structuring discussion that may or may not be a lead-in to a decision.
Roles[ edit ] The consensus decision-making process often has several roles designed to make the process run more effectively. Although the name and nature of these roles varies from group to group, the most common are the facilitatorconsensora timekeeper, an empath and a secretary or notes taker.
Not all decision-making bodies use all of these roles, although the facilitator position is almost always filled, and some groups use supplementary roles, such as a Devil's advocate or greeter. Some decision-making bodies rotate these roles through the group members in order to build the experience and skills of the participants, and prevent any perceived concentration of power.
As the name implies, the role of the facilitator is to help make the process of reaching a consensus decision easier. Facilitators accept responsibility for moving through the agenda on time; ensuring the group adheres to the mutually agreed-upon mechanics of the consensus process; and, if necessary, suggesting alternate or additional discussion or decision-making techniques, such as go-arounds, break-out groups or role-playing.
Shared facilitation is often adopted to diffuse the perceived power of the facilitator and create a system whereby a co-facilitator can pass off facilitation duties if he or she becomes more personally engaged in a debate.
The team of consensors is responsible for accepting those relevant proposals which conform with the UN Charter on Human Rights; for displaying an initial list of these options; for drawing up a balanced list of options to represent the entire debate; to analyse the preferences cast in any subsequent MBC ballot; and, if need be, to determine the composite decision from the two most popular options.
The purpose of the timekeeper is to ensure the decision-making body keeps to the schedule set in the agenda. Effective timekeepers use a variety of techniques to ensure the meeting runs on time including: The empath, or 'vibe watch' as the position is sometimes called, is charged with monitoring the 'emotional climate' of the meeting, taking note of the body language and other non-verbal cues of the participants.
Defusing potential emotional conflicts, maintaining a climate free of intimidation and being aware of potentially destructive power dynamics, such as sexism or racism within the decision-making body, are the primary responsibilities of the empath.
The role of the notes taker or secretary is to document the decisions, discussion and action points of the decision-making body. Tools and methods[ edit ] This section may contain too much repetition or redundant language.
Please help improve it by merging similar text or removing repeated statements. November Non-verbal techniques[ edit ] Non-verbal means of expression can also reduce contention or keep issues from spreading out in time across an entire meeting.
Various methods of agenda control exist, mostly relying on an explicit chairperson with the power to interrupt off-topic or rambling discourse. This gets more difficult if there is no such chair and accordingly the attitude of the entire group must be assessed by each speaker.
Verbal interruptions inevitably become common, possibly in the form of grumbling, muttering, and eventually sharp words, if there is no effective means of cutting off persons making false factual statements or rambling off a topic.
Intent to register a reactive comment is signaled by a different hand signal than is intent to register a unique comment.
We used an index finger for the former and a full hand for the latter. The Occupy movement has used these methods.
Most often, each member is given a set of three colored cards: The cards can be raised during the process to indicate the member's input. Cards can be used during the discussion phase as well as during a call for consensus.
The cards have different meanings, depending on the phase in which they are used. During discussion, a red card is used to indicate a point of process or a breach of the agreed upon procedures.
Identifying offtopic discussions, speakers going over allowed time limits or other breaks in the process are uses for the red card. During a call for consensus, the red card indicates the member's opposition usually a "principled objection" to the proposal at hand.
When a member, or members, use a red card, it becomes their responsibility to work with the proposing committee to come up with a solution that works for everyone. In the discussion phase, the yellow card is used to indicate a member's ability to clarify a point being discussed or answer a question being posed.
Yellow is used during a call for consensus to register a stand aside to the proposal or to formally state any reservations. A group member can use a green card during discussion to add to the speakers list. During a call for consensus, the green card indicates consent. Some decision-making bodies use a modified version of the colored card system with additional colors, such as orange to indicate a non-blocking reservation stronger than a stand-aside.
They have been found useful in facilitating groups of 6 to people. They are particularly useful when the group is multi-lingual.
Nonetheless, there is a widely adopted core set of hand signals.The Green Building Index (GBI) is Malaysia's industry recognised green rating tool for buildings to promote sustainability in the built environment and raise awareness among Developers, Architects, Engineers, Planners, Designers, Contractors and the Public about environmental issues and our responsibility to the future generations.
Oregon RTIi identifies nine components that are critical for deep and sustainable implementation of an RTI system that effectively meets the needs of all learners, improves achievement outcomes, and is sustainable over time.
- Welcome to our Communication Tip today, building consensus around your ideas. Let's address why consensus is important, what consensus actually is, and when you should use it. First, consensus decision making is an attribute of high-performance teams.
Rather than voting, which leaves clear winners and losers, the best teams. Consensus decision-making is a group decision-making process in which group members develop, and agree to support a decision in the best interest of the whole.
Consensus may be defined professionally as an acceptable resolution, one that can be supported, even if not the "favourite" of each individual. Consensus is a normal and usually implicit and invisible process across Wikipedia. Any edit that is not disputed or reverted by another editor can be assumed to have caninariojana.com that edit later be revised by another editor without dispute, it can be assumed that a new consensus has been reached.
Thousands of preventable injuries and deaths are annually caused by microbial, chemical and physical hazards from building water systems. Water is processed in buildings before use; this can degrade the quality of the water.
Processing steps undertaken on-site in buildings often include conditioning, filtering, storing, heating, cooling, pressure regulation and distribution through fixtures.